Companies we repeatedly work alongside across major UAE construction, infrastructure and development programmes.
Wade Adams
Dutco
Binghatti
China State Construction
China Railway Construction
Al Naboodah
Sobha Constructions
Saudi Binladin Group
Hilalco
Kharafi National
Ginco
Western Bainoona Group
DBB Contracting
Group AMANA
BK Gulf
BESIX
ARCO General ContractingVerified ISO management systems
Full certificateQuality
Documented processes, quality checks and continual improvement across certified operations.
Full certificateEnvironment
A structured approach to waste, resources and environmental impact during demolition activities.
Full certificateHealth & safety
Systematic control of occupational risks, site hazards and worker wellbeing.
ITMAD and EIAC marks are displayed together, at equal visual weight and without altered proportions, in accordance with the issuer's rules for web use.
Fleet update · Dubai 2026
A new generation of remote-controlled demolition capability for confined, sensitive and high-risk concrete work across Dubai and the Emirates.
A different kind of force
Robotic demolition does not replace engineering. It gives the engineered sequence a compact, remotely operated carrier capable of placing hydraulic force precisely where the structure needs to change.
The operator controls the machine from outside the immediate breaking and falling-material zone, with a clear view of the work and the exclusion area.
Tracked robotic platforms can be considered where conventional excavators are too large, including plant rooms, basements and interior refurbishment zones.
Hydraulic movement and remote visibility support selective breaking around retained structure, services and sensitive interfaces.
Breakers, concrete crushers, grapples and buckets allow the platform to follow the engineered sequence instead of forcing one tool onto every condition.
Real machines · Real work
The new fleet expands the range between compact access and high-output breaking. Final machine class is selected only after the site, structure and load path are understood.
Compact access classCompact tracked geometry for interior routes, selective walls, plant rooms and spaces where conventional machines cannot approach the workface.
High-output breaking classA stable remotely operated platform for heavier breaking, crushing and progressive slab removal under a project-specific structural sequence.
Fleet photography from Arasar’s established robotic-demolition media library. Exact carrier and attachment configuration is confirmed per project.
Attachment ecosystem
The carrier is only the beginning. Interchangeable hydraulic tools allow the same platform to break, crush, sort and clear through a coordinated sequence.
High-energy breaking for reinforced concrete, refractory material and localised structural removal.
Controlled crushing where lower noise and vibration are important to the retained environment.
Handling, separating and loading debris while keeping the workface organised.
Excavation, material movement and project-specific tooling selected around the actual constraint.
Where robotics earns its place
Robots are not selected because they look advanced. They are selected when remote operation, compact access and controlled hydraulic force solve a real site constraint.
Robotic demolition workflow
Every deployment connects machine selection to structural review, access, temporary controls, operator positioning and progressive material removal.
Verify the travel route, openings, floor capacity, working radius, power and debris path before the machine enters the work zone.
Match the tool, machine class and temporary controls to the material, retained structure and required production rate.
Operate through the engineered sequence with exclusion zones, dust controls, supervision and continuous communication.
Remove broken material in controlled stages so access, visibility and structural loading remain within the planned limits.
Remote does not mean risk-free
Robotic operation can move the operator away from the immediate breaking zone, but it still requires competent supervision, verified exclusion areas, controlled movement, emergency procedures and a structure-specific sequence.
Explore the complete robotic breaking serviceFleet questions
Final capacity, access and attachment choices are always confirmed after a project-specific review.
They are especially valuable in confined, operational or structurally sensitive environments where conventional excavators cannot access the workface and direct manual breaking would create unnecessary exposure.
Potentially, but never by assumption. The access route, slab capacity, point loads, working position and debris load must be reviewed before the platform is selected or mobilised.
Common attachments include hydraulic breakers, concrete crushers, grapples and buckets. The final attachment and carrier configuration is selected around the actual material and removal sequence.
No. It reduces direct exposure at the workface, but competent operators, exclusion zones, structural planning, supervision, dust control and emergency procedures remain essential.
The fleet expansion is being introduced as a capability update. Final machine class, attachment and technical configuration are confirmed in the project proposal so the selected system matches the site rather than a generic specification.
A new machine should solve a real constraint
